Corporate Governance – Liability of Independent Directors

The article discusses the current state of corporate governance in India and the trend of independent directors being held liable for any wrongful act of the company.

Corporate governance is based on the principles of conducting business lawfully with high integrity and transparency. It includes addressing related party conflicts, building efficient risk management systems, respect for independence of the board, compliance of laws in letter and spirit, respect for international laws, building a no tolerance zone for corruption including anti-bribery policies, prevention of sexual harassment at the workplace, appropriate policies for safety and environmental control, having a succession planning in place and most importantly, accountability to stake holders.

Several factors may be responsible, individually or collectively, for the failure in corporate governance including.

In modern times, when trade and commerce are being controlled by corporates, there is a huge expectation that these corporates will adhere to the high standards of corporate governance. Under the corporate veil, it is the management team which runs the show. In most cases, companies are run by the promoter family. The companies which are not run by the family as promoters are far and few. It is critical that governance structures are in place for the companies so that the success or failure of the company is not dependent upon the whims and fancies of any individual family member. Key management persons also need to be subjected to regulatory and proper corporate governance structures.

Corporate governance is a global issue and is not restricted to India. There have been several reported cases of corporate fraud worldwide where the lack of sound corporate governance guidelines has led to financial disaster.

In spite of the global awareness and measures taken from time to time to improve the corporate governance framework, the monster continues to grow, and the surprises keep on coming.

Several large companies and their promoters have cases pending before the NCLT filed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and /or are being investigated by several investigative agencies like Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO); Central Bureau of Investigations (CBI); Income Tax Investigation office; Enforcement Directorate; Economic Offences Wing (EOW); Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) which has a bearing on the subject.

The most talked about cases in India in the recent past which show a clear and flagrant disregard for corporate governance guidelines include, the Satyam episode; the ILFS case; the MD and CEO of a leading private bank being investigated by CBI; the Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi scandal which lead to a massive banking scam and the matter of Vijay Mallya.

Corporate governance is required not only in the private sector but also public sector. It is unfortunate that in a welfare state like India, despite over seven decades of independence, the Government of India is the biggest litigator before judicial and quasi-judicial fora. It is high time that even the government introspects how the governance and accountability standards can be improved.

Today, there is a serious reluctance on the part of eminent and experienced persons to join the board of any company. Unfortunately, there are several cases where investigating agencies implicate the independent directors for any wrong committed by the company or the management of the company. Further, there are several cases where any person aggrieved by the company’s acts implicates the independent directors in the judicial proceedings or criminal proceedings, based on which courts and investigating agencies issue show cause notices to the independent directors. There is also a trend in the banking industry, where without any application of mind and without describing the role of the independent director, in cases where the borrower defaults, the lender implicates the independent directors for fraud and wilful default.

Section 149(12) of the Companies Act provides that an independent director or non-executive director shall be held liable, only in respect of such omission or commission by a company which had occurred with his knowledge, attributable through Board process and with his consent, connivance or where he had not acted diligently. Similar provisions are contained in Section 27(2) of the SEBI Act.

In the matter of V Selvaraj Vs. The Reserve Bank of India, High Court of Madras, it is clearly held that an independent director shall be held responsible only in respect of such acts of commission or omission by a company which occurred with his knowledge, consent or connivance.

In the matter of Sunil Bharti Mittal v. CBI, the Supreme Court held that an individual can be held liable for an offence by the company (i) if there is sufficient evidence of the individual’s active role coupled with criminal intent; or (ii) where the statute itself stipulates the liability of directors and other officials.

Further, the classification of fraud is now guided by ‘Reserve Bank of India (Fraud Risk Management in Commercial Banks (including Regional Rural Banks) and All India Financial Institutions) Directions, 2024 as issued on July 15, 2024 (“RBI Master Directions 2024”) which clarifies that independent directors are not usually in charge of, or responsible to the company for the conduct of business of the company. Therefore, banks should consider this before taking any action against such directors.

Therefore, it is critical that before any show cause notice is issued to any independent director, it is ascertained whether he had any role to play in the allegation so that the judicial or investigation process is not abused, nor any harassment is caused in the process.

Corporate governance is not an attitude, but a philosophy of the company based on the ethics of the promoters or persons running the business. It’s not transactional, but a way of life. It’s like following a daily routine by the company. It’s a very serious matter and cannot be taken lightly.

On one hand, the lack of corporate governance can bring any company to its knees. On the other hand, sound corporate governance can provide wings to a company towards its unprecedented success.

About the author: Rajesh Narain Gupta is the Founder and Chairman of SNG & Partners.

Internship & Articleship

Error: Contact form not found.

Disclaimer

By proceeding further and clicking on the “I ACCEPT” button below, you acknowledge that you of your own accord wish to know more about SNG & Partners (“The Firm”) for your own information and use. You further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from SNG & Partners or any of its employees, partners, associates or members to create an attorney-client relationship through this website. You further acknowledge having read and understood this Disclaimer.

This website is a resource for informational purposes only and is intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct, complete, and up-to-date. While SNG & Partners has taken utmost care to ensure accuracy and completeness of the information contained on this website, the Firm does not warrant that the information contained on this website is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims any and all liability for any loss or damage caused or alleged to have been caused to any person by relying on any information contained on this website. The contents of this website should not be construed as an opinion, legal or otherwise, on any issue or subject. 

SNG & Partners further assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the information contained in this website, nor does it offer a warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The owner of this website does not intend links from this site to other Internet websites to be referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with the linked entities. The Firm is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties about the contents of websites to which links may be provided from this website.

Furthermore, the owner of this website does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based solely upon viewing this website or in a Country/State where this website fails to comply with local laws and ethical rules of that state. You may note that the use of the internet or email for conveying confidential or sensitive information is susceptible to risks of disclosure associated with sending email over the internet.

The Firm advises against the use of the communication platform provided on this website for exchange of any confidential, business or politically sensitive information. User is expected to use his or her judgment and such information shared will be solely at the user’s risk.

Communication through this website in any form shall be for the purpose of enquiries only and shall not hold good for service of any kind of court proceedings, summons, advance notice, pleadings etc. For service of any such document and/or notice to the Firm and/or to any of its partners under the act or rules including under CPC, Cr. PC and/or any other law shall be served at our concerned office or to the concerned advocate dealing with the matter.