Jet Resolution plan hits turbulence

Jet Airways’ resolution plan has hit turbulence, with the Supreme Court quashing the RBI’s February 12 circular based on which the airline’s financial restructuring was being worked out.

The Jet Airways board on March 25, 2019, had approved “the conversion of ₹1 of lenders’ debt into equity by the issuance of 11.4 crore equity shares, in accordance with the RBI circular of February 12, 2018. With this, the consortium of Indian lenders, led by State Bank of India will become majority shareholders of Jet Airways,” the airline had stated.

Now that the very circular on which the resolution plan was based has been made void, the plan will either be derailed or reworked, feel analysts. This, in turn, will further delay recapitalisation of the airline which is in dire need of cash infusion to stay afloat.

SC decision may derail scheme; 15 more planes grounded

‘Challenge likely’

It is also believed that promoter Naresh Goyal, who was forced by the banks to resign, may challenge the decision.

Strategic investor Etihad Airways may also challenge the way the resolution plan is being drawn.

A Jet Airways official declined to comment. Etihad Airways could not be reached for comment.

Rajesh Narain Gupta, managing partner, SNG Parters, said, “If the banks have relied upon this circular which is now held to be void by the Supreme Court, then the borrower may get the right to unwind what has been done pursuant to the said circular, which may become a complex legal situation to deal with.”

Ashish Chhawchharia, partner, Restructuring Services, Grant Thornton Advisory Private Ltd., said, “I don’t think there would be any impact on the approach the banks are taking for the resolution of Jet Airways matter.”

Meanwhile, the airline on Tuesday grounded 15 more aircraft owing to non-payment of lease rentals to lessors. This leaves Jet with just 20 planes in operation.

Makarand Joshi, Partner, MMJC and Associates LLP – a corporate compliance firm said, “By virtue of this verdict, validity of action taken by banks under the circular (eg. allotment of shares at discount to bank) may be challenged. And if banks’ action is challenged, the validity of transfer of title done by banks under the circular can also be challenged.”

“Therefore, the verdict may compel banks to take corrective action to transfer valid title (shares or otherwise) to interested buyer. This might have impact on cases like Jet Airways.”

Jet Airways stock on Tuesday closed with a loss of 0.39% at ₹264.90 on the BSE.

Internship & Articleship

[contact-form-7 id="1843" title="Internships/Paralegals"]

Disclaimer

By proceeding further and clicking on the “I ACCEPT” button below, you acknowledge that you of your own accord wish to know more about SNG & Partners (“The Firm”) for your own information and use. You further acknowledge that there has been no solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort whatsoever from SNG & Partners or any of its employees, partners, associates or members to create an attorney-client relationship through this website. You further acknowledge having read and understood this Disclaimer.

This website is a resource for informational purposes only and is intended, but not promised or guaranteed, to be correct, complete, and up-to-date. While SNG & Partners has taken utmost care to ensure accuracy and completeness of the information contained on this website, the Firm does not warrant that the information contained on this website is accurate or complete, and hereby disclaims any and all liability for any loss or damage caused or alleged to have been caused to any person by relying on any information contained on this website. The contents of this website should not be construed as an opinion, legal or otherwise, on any issue or subject. 

SNG & Partners further assumes no liability for the interpretation and/or use of the information contained in this website, nor does it offer a warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The owner of this website does not intend links from this site to other Internet websites to be referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with the linked entities. The Firm is not responsible for, and makes no representations or warranties about the contents of websites to which links may be provided from this website.

Furthermore, the owner of this website does not wish to represent anyone desiring representation based solely upon viewing this website or in a Country/State where this website fails to comply with local laws and ethical rules of that state. You may note that the use of the internet or email for conveying confidential or sensitive information is susceptible to risks of disclosure associated with sending email over the internet.

The Firm advises against the use of the communication platform provided on this website for exchange of any confidential, business or politically sensitive information. User is expected to use his or her judgment and such information shared will be solely at the user’s risk.

Communication through this website in any form shall be for the purpose of enquiries only and shall not hold good for service of any kind of court proceedings, summons, advance notice, pleadings etc. For service of any such document and/or notice to the Firm and/or to any of its partners under the act or rules including under CPC, Cr. PC and/or any other law shall be served at our concerned office or to the concerned advocate dealing with the matter.